The Riot Shield Dilemma in Modern Warfare 3

This article provides an in-depth look at Modern Warfare 3's Riot Shield controversy and the community's proposed solutions to make it a more viable part of the game.

Modern Warfare 3 (MW3) players have expressed their dissatisfaction with the Riot Shield’s defensive capabilities and proposed a straightforward solution to make it a more essential part of the game.

From the moment the Riot Shield was introduced into the game, it sparked a series of debates and controversy among the player community. The debates have continued to this day with MW3, questioning not only its applicability but its functions as a whole.

New Audio Pack for Modern Warfare 2 Causes a Stir
Related Article

The main goal for players exploring these solutions is to make the shield work as something that provides advantages but can also, when necessary, be countered. They look at it not solely as a defensive tool but also as an element of strategy.

The Riot Shield Dilemma in Modern Warfare 3 ImageAlt

Some enthusiasts have come forward with a potential solution to the Riot Shield issue. The solution is logical and has sparked considerable interest and discussion within the community.

Proposed Solution to the Riot Shield Issue

A straight-forward solution was put forward on a MW3 discussion forum with the premise that armor-piercing rounds should have the ability to penetrate riot shields. The argument is that armor-piercing rounds have the innate ability to penetrate surfaces far thicker than a Riot Shield.

A distinct strength of this proposition, according to a majority of the players, is its simplicity. With this change, the Riot Shield would still serve its purpose as a defensive mechanism, but it would have a clear and fair counter in gameplay.

The community's response to this idea has been largely supportive, indicating a collective desire for a change in the Riot Shield's functionality.

Gamer's Impatience Grows as Call of Duty Matches Swarmed with Hackers
Related Article

However, like every proposed change in a well-established and deeply loved game, this solution has its share of critics who question the necessity of this proposed change.

The Debate over the Riot Shield

A significant number of players believe that the Riot Shield should have some form of "stamina". In other words, the shield would lose its functionality or at least diminish in its protection, after sustained damage over a game.

Fellow players have also suggested that the shield should disintegrate after being shot a certain number of times. This echoes the earlier proposition of finite "stamina" suggesting a common desire for weakened Riot Shield resistance.

Despite these criticisms, a sizable portion of MW3 players believe the Riot Shield isn't a problem at all. These players argue that dealing with shields is more a matter of skill than an issue with the game’s design.

Some gamers have come forth, making strong accusations against those wanting changes, stating that these players are simply disgruntled because they fail to strategize against shields. This shows a belief that these gamers' complaints originate not from the game’s design or mechanics but their own inability to adapt.

Supporters of the Riot Shield argue that multiple counters for it already exist in the game, such as Molotov's, semtex, and more. They suggest that these critics are simply refusing to adjust their strategy or use different equipment.

While this solution garners significant discussion among the MW3 player community, no official statement or planned adjustment has been put forward by the MW3 developers regarding the Riot Shield’s in-game status.

In conclusion, it is clear that the Riot Shield presents a complex and controversial subject within the MW3 community. Debates and arguments around its functionalities and the proposed solutions continue to date, a testament to the community's fervor, commitment, and love for the game.